Cutting off food cuts off learning

A budget is more than numbers—it reflects our values and who we choose to support or ignore. Lawmakers, including my Rep. John James, are pushing one of the most divisive budget proposals in recent history and we must demand transparency about how deep cuts to SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) will affect Michiganders.

Rep. James says he wants to focus on the “fundamentals of literacy.” But how can students learn if they come to school hungry? SNAP and free school meals are critical to student success—according to the National Library of medicine, research consistently shows that food security improves academic performance.

The proposed $300 billion in cuts to nutrition programs would disproportionately harm vulnerable communities. These cuts could result in:— 2 million children losing access to food assistance.

• 250,000 seniors being affected by food insecurity.

• In Michigan alone, 39% of SNAP recipients are seniors or people with disabilities.

• Programs like Meals on Wheels would also suffer, potentially forcing many to choose between food and medication—or go without both.

Rep. James told The Detroit News in April 2025 that “education is a basic civil right.” If he means that, he must also recognize that proper nutrition is fundamental to securing that right — especially for students in disadvantaged districts.

If he truly stands with his constituents — students, families, and seniors—he should vote no on this harmful budget. Supporting food assistance isn’t just compassionate; it’s essential to education, health, and dignity.

Jill Murphy

Mount Clemens

Budget takes aim at veterans

Budgets in America tell a story about what and who matters to us. The budget bill recently passed by House Republicans would slash 80,000 jobs at the Department of Veterans Affairs—limiting access to essential medical and mental health care for those who served.

Since 25% of VA staff are veterans themselves, this bill not only cuts their care—it cuts veterans’ jobs. It also excludes their families from the expanded $2,500 Child Tax Credit.

The harm doesn’t end there. Cuts to Medicaid and SNAP will hit veterans hard. Nearly 1.6 million veterans rely on Medicaid, including 10% of veterans in Michigan, and thousands more depend on SNAP to afford food while facing unemployment, low wages, or disabilities. Others use ACA coverage made possible by premium subsidies and are also at risk under this proposal.

This bill breaks the promises we’ve made to our veterans. It’s not fiscal responsibility—it’s a betrayal. If Representative James truly supports veterans, he should vote no on this budget. While he received a taxpayer-funded education through West Point, this proposal threatens to cut or reduce GI Bill benefits for current and retired service members.

Rep. James must remember and honor his oath to the Constitution and to the country he pledged to serve. Our veterans deserve better than a budget that turns its back on them.

Ron Smith

Clinton Twp.