Confusion over President Donald Trump’s tariffs continued Monday with questions swirling around consumer electronics, auto tariffs and duties on computer chips.

Here’s a look at each industry and what’s new or still to be determined.

Electronics

Late Friday, U.S. Customs and Border Protection said electronics, including smartphones and laptops, would be excluded from broader, so-called “reciprocal” tariffs, meaning these goods wouldn’t be subject to most tariffs levied on China to date or the 10% baseline levies imposed on other countries.

But U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later said this was only a temporary reprieve, telling ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday that electronics will be included under future sector-specific tariffs on semiconductor products, set to arrive in “probably a month or two.”

And not all of the levies that the U.S. has imposed on countries like China fall under the White House’s “reciprocal” categorization. Hours after Lutnick’s comments, Trump declared on social media that there was no “exception” at all, adding to confusion. Trump instead argued that these goods are “just moving to a different” bucket. He also said that China will still face a 20% levy on electronics imports as part of his administration’s prior move related to fentanyl trafficking.

Foreign autos and parts

Trump on Monday suggested he might temporarily exempt the auto industry from tariffs he previously imposed on the sector, to give carmakers time to adjust their supply chains.

“I’m looking at something to help some of the car companies with it,” Trump told reporters gathered in the Oval Office. The Republican president said automakers needed time to relocate production from Canada, Mexico and other places, “And they need a little bit of time because they’re going to make them here, but they need a little bit of time. So I’m talking about things like that.”

The statement hinted at yet another round of reversals on tariffs as Trump’s onslaught of import taxes has panicked financial markets and raised deep concerns from Wall Street economists about a possible recession.

When Trump announced the 25% auto tariffs on March 27, he described them as “permanent.” His hard lines on trade have become increasingly blurred as he has sought to limit the possible economic and political blowback from his policies.

Drugs, chips next?

Trump also signaled Monday that he would soon announce additional tariffs targeting imported computer chips and pharmaceuticals.

And for a second day, Trump hinted that he would soon impose new tariffs on semiconductors, as he looks to shore up more domestic production of a vital component in electronics, cars, toys and other goods.

“The higher the tariff, the faster they come in,” Trump said Monday, citing other import taxes he has imposed on steel, aluminum and cars.

The United States is heavily dependent on chips imported from Taiwan and elsewhere in Asia, a reliance that Democrats and Republicans alike have described as a major risk to national security.

The president said he was also preparing new tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, arguing that too many vital medicines are imported from Ireland and other countries and not produced in the U.S.

“We don’t make our own drugs anymore,” Trump said.

Small businesses sue

Several small U.S. businesses sued Trump over his “Liberation Day” tariffs in the latest legal challenge to his use of sweeping executive powers to extract concessions from foreign trade partners.

Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs is unconstitutional and the emergency he declared to justify the levies “is a figment of his own imagination,” the companies said in a suit filed Monday in the U.S. Court of International Trade. “Trade deficits, which have persisted for decades without causing economic harm, are not an emergency.”

The suit is at least the third challenging Trump’s tariffs, though some industry groups in the U.S. have been hesitant to oppose the levies in court. IEEPA gives the president broad power to regulate certain financial transactions when declaring a national emergency in response to an “unusual and extraordinary threat.”

Compiled from Associated Press, New York Times and Bloomberg reports.