I received many times the usual number of comments regarding my recent column on the “Family Friendly Vibrant Neighborhoods” survey and the willingness of some council members to ignore what the apparent majority of citizens respondents want. These came to me directly and also via NextDoor. Here are some of them, occasionally with edits for length and style:

“Thank you for your editorial/letter about growth in Boulder. I thought I was the only one noticing and concerned about it!!”

“The ‘progressives’ who have taken control of Boulder just seem to be developers in disguise.”

“Neighborhood densifying: nothing has been said about PARKING — a disaster for those who do not have a driveway to park.”

“Why do the ‘progressives’ just want to stuff more and more people (and cars) into Boulder? It just makes no sense.”

“Collectively the community survey delivered a statistically significant ‘against’ the proposed changes … two to one not in favor, for instance in regard to RL-1 changes. As one of the most educated communities in the nation, we can collaborate and solve for this without the significant and detrimental first and second-order impacts that come from higher density. … Let’s pause any significant changes and have a citywide conversation on where we want to go and how we want to get there.”

“Kudos to you Steve for saying it like it is in today’s editorial! It reflected my thoughts exactly.”

“As usual, Steve’s right! Who wants to densify Boulder? The Boulder Progressives who have aligned with developers. They have sold this as a way to decrease prices, but that never happens … when the demand is almost unlimited.”

“Can you say foregone conclusion? Just like Iris and other pet projects of this city council.”

“Well, this wouldn’t be the first time the city ignored things they don’t want to hear … have fun on (or near) Iris Ave next year :)”

“Vote the progressives out before they destroy our city.”

“Do we get a refund on the cost of the survey they ordered? Any consequences since they admit they must have done it wrong?”

“I live in S Boulder, directly under the redevelopment of the Lutheran church, now the Senior Affordable Housing facility. Before the development began we received these tiny postcards in the mail informing us of a public meeting to discuss the city’s plans. We got the word out and everyone impacted by this development showed up. They were shocked! We were not agreeable to the change to our neighborhood and they were forced to have more public meetings. They PRETENDED to care about our input and concerns. Turns out it was already a done deal. They spouted a lot of nonsense about ‘Preserving the identity and feel of a neighborhood.’ They even submitted 3 different architectural plans for our reviews. They chose the one we disliked the most! Turns out it was already a done deal.”

“Steve’s dead nuts on. I’d like to see the obfuscation(s) pulled aside to expose the REAL agendas here. Who in positions of power and influence is ‘getting paid’?”

“Really, it’s only when you run nonsensical, patently irrational behaviors through the ‘power/money’ filter that things … suddenly make sense.”

“The self-named progressives here are not left. They are the ultimate growth and development people. These people are not progressives. Progressives conserve. Our city council is going for something grandiose, flash, and waste.”

“BTW, on Iris today west of 28th. Traffic reduced to one lane and backed up 3 blocks! Not even a busy time.”

“I agree with Steve on everything except one thing. The opposite of the NIMBY insult is YIYBY. The people who are telling us we need to destroy our quality of life are not volunteering to destroy their own quality of life too. Densification is forcing people like me to move out of Boulder so that the progressives can have it for themselves.”

“Remember, zoning rules are a two-way contract between the city and its residents. Residents don’t get to violate the zoning rules, but apparently the city can arbitrarily change zoning rules without even checking with the people it’s going to impact.”

“Steve is correct in saying that people put down their hard-earned cash to buy into areas — and they should have a right to keep those areas intact. But, as John Locke pointed out in his book — when trust is broken, a democracy will not function and will cease to exist. And in that construct the progressives are no less a threat than the MAGA right.”

Steve Pomerance is a former member of the Boulder City Council. Email stevepomerance@yahoo.com.