Porter County officials will not address a proposed data center possibly in Wheeler at the March 26 Plan Commission meeting, citing the need to do their homework on the proposal and not rob a previously scheduled item of its due.

“We never published the agenda with them on it,” said Mike Jabo, Porter County’s director of planning and stormwater management. He said the petitioner, which has already filed with the county, requested placement on the March 26 agenda.

However, a subdivision seeking approval is expected to draw a large crowd that evening.

“I think the people who were already scheduled to be at the meeting would not get their due,” Jabo said, adding that the county might need a larger venue when the data center is discussed. “The commissioners’ chamber would probably not be suitable to hold that meeting.” A date to address the proposed data center has not been chosen.

The Post-Tribune, through an Access to Public Records Act request, is awaiting an opportunity to review the data center application. Under the county’s Unified Development Ordinance, a petitioner has to go before the Plan Commission if it does not meet the zoning requirements for a project.

Residents in Chesterton, Burns Harbor and, most recently, Valparaiso, have fought back against data centers proposed for land adjacent to residential areas over concerns about noise, bright lights, and their requirements for water and other resources.

A rezoning request would have a first hearing where the public may comment. Property owners within 500 feet from any property line of the parcel in question would receive a formal letter informing them of the hearing, while other forms of advertisement are also employed. “What we have is a very publicly-involved process,” Jabo said.The plan commission forwards a recommendation either favorable or unfavorable to the Porter County Board of Commissioners, who would then have two readings, the first at a public hearing, while the second does not require a public hearing.

“They weren’t happy that that meeting was canceled,” Board of Commissioners President Jim Biggs, R-North, said of the petitioner, “but we need time to do some of our own homework. We’re talking about a generational decision here.”

Biggs said several companies have expressed interest in developing data centers in Porter County, but he, Porter County Council President Andy Vasquez, R-2nd, and County Attorney Scott McClure have met with representatives from one of them. “They’re from out west somewhere,” he said.

“There was no talk of what they’d pay in taxes. There was no talk of where they’d be located,” he added. “The rumor is it would be out there in the Wheeler area and it very well may be, but they had not disclosed that.”

Should a data center be approved for Porter County, Biggs said it would be a “game-changer” and the largest economic development project the county has taken on since the development of Bethlehem Steel.

He said while the county is absolutely committed to responding to public sentiment – “We’ve already done that with solar, telling them to go away.” – every option needs to be fairly considered to meet the state’s growing demands that counties become more fiscally independent.

“We’re already having the discussion on raising the income tax, which is going to be less popular than data centers,” Biggs said.

Jabo and Biggs have talked about chartering a bus to visit a data center to witness noise levels and see how they’re kept.

Biggs promises, particularly to the communities that would potentially be affected, that the county would not approve anything detrimental. “I hope we have proven ourselves with solar,” he said. “Please allow us just to do our job. Let us process this.”

Shelley Jones is a freelance reporter for the Post-Tribune.