Crows do it, chimps do it, even spitting archerfish do it — tool use isn’t even close to being uniquely human. But it turns out that something scientists did think was unique to our kind — the repeated creation of sharp stone flakes that our ancestors used for cutting up meat — might not be all that special. Researchers have found that bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) unintentionally create sharp flakes that look just like those found with early hominins.

These Brazilian primates aren’t using the flakes for butchering. In fact, they don’t give a hoot about the potential tools. The flakes, described in a study published Wednesday in Nature, are a natural byproduct of the species’s mysterious stone hammering ritual.

The monkeys frequently go to quartz cliffs and pick up rounded stones with one or both hands, then smash those hammers violently against the cliff face. They chip away at quartz cemented into the cliff, covering themselves in razor-sharp rock dust and licking at the stuff.

When the behavior was first identified in 2007, scientists thought it was some kind of aggressive warning to keep competitors at bay, but now many primatologists believe the dust itself serves some purpose. It could be that minerals inside the stones — or fragments of the lichen that grows on them — serve some kind of medicinal purpose for the monkeys. They could even be swallowing the glasslike dust to cleanse their digestive tract of parasites.

Whatever the intended purpose, one thing is for certain: The monkeys’ brutal pounding turns pieces of their hammer stones into flakes very much like the ones found at early human encampments. And they really, really don’t care.

‘‘The flakes are completely unintentional,’’ first author ­Tomos Proffitt of Oxford University said in an interview. In fact, the monkeys he and his colleagues observed almost always ignored the flakes that our ancestors found so useful.

‘‘They show no interest in them whatsoever. They have no use for a sharp cutting edge.’’Washington Post

There’s nothing to suggest that the artifacts previously identified as ancient human tools were actually made by monkeys, Proffitt explained, even though the monkey flakes ‘‘very closely mimic’’ those fragments.

‘‘The complexity that we see with the early hominin material and the range of methods is far more complex than anything we see with the capuchins,’’ he said. Besides, many of those ancient artifacts were found in association with human fossils, and with signs of human use like scattered bones scarred by butchering. Researchers have also found signs that early humans had the ingenuity to turn stone flakes into new kinds of tools by reshaping them.

‘‘You certainly don’t see the monkeys doing that,’’ Proffitt said — unless you count the way they sometimes pulverize the would-be tools in search of more precious quartz dust.

Proffitt and his coauthors want to find out just how common these creations are throughout the primate lineage. It’s possible that chimpanzees, some of whom use a similar percussive motion to crack nuts, would create the same flakes if the stones they used were more quartz-like. And other species of capuchin monkey might practice similar unintentional stone working.

While the findings don’t change what we know about human tool use, Proffitt said, they do raise interesting questions about where it might have come from.

‘‘It has long been discussed that a behavior similar to chimp nut-cracking — a percussive food collecting behavior — could have been a precursor to the mechanism humans used to create stone flakes for tools,’’ he said. ‘‘If they noticed that the sharp edges could be useful, flake use could have emerged that way, as a byproduct of something else.’’

The capuchin flakes strengthen that hypothesis, and Proffitt hopes that he and other researchers will be able to trace the behavior back in time. If they can find accidental flakes far enough back in history, they might be able to show that the first butchering tools came from recycled rock junk.