WASHINGTON — The Senate voted Thursday to confirm Gina Haspel as the next CIA director, after several Democrats were persuaded to support her despite lingering concerns about her role in the brutal interrogation of suspected terrorists captured after 9/11.
Lawmakers approved Haspel’s nomination 54 to 45, with six Democrats voting yes and two Republicans voting no, after the agency made a big push to bolster Haspel’s chances.
She appears to have been helped by some last-minute persuasion by former CIA directors John Brennan and Leon Panetta, who contacted at least five of the six Democrats who voted to endorse her bid to join President Trump’s Cabinet, according to people with knowledge of the interactions.
Haspel has not had as close of a relationship with Trump as the CIA’s previous director, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who is one of the president’s closest advisers, according to people with knowledge of Haspel and Trump’s interactions.
But she has been successful, to a degree, in influencing the president’s stance toward Russia, whose aggressive and adversarial posture toward the West has become a top national security priority for the administration.
Following a nerve agent attack in Britain that US and British officials blamed on the Russian government, Haspel argued for a forceful response, which ultimately led to the United States expelling 60 Russian intelligence operatives and shuttering a Russian consulate in Seattle, people with knowledge of her role said.
Haspel was a leading player in the multiagency response to the attack and advised the president to make a bold demonstration to counter Russia and stand with Britain, the United States’ closest intelligence ally, these people said.
Trump had wavered in his support for Haspel, at times expressing doubt in private meetings about whether she had the support to win confirmation, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
Earlier this month, Haspel sought to withdraw after some White House officials worried her role in the CIA’s nomination program could derail her chances.
Trump decided to push for Haspel to stay in the running, after first signaling he would support whatever decision she made, administration officials said.
Haspel’s ascent to the top post in the nation’s most storied spy service says much about the CIA’s past and its future.
She will be the first woman to serve as director. When Haspel joined the CIA in 1985, there were fewer opportunities for women to live the life of a cloak-and-dagger operative that she found alluring. Haspel took a posting as field officer in Ethiopia, an unglamorous assignment, but one that taught her how to run operations against agents for the Soviet Union, then a benefactor of the Ethiopian government.
In her bid to become the next director, Haspel and her supporters emphasized the historic nature of her nomination and how her career tracked with the rise of women in the intelligence services.
After Thursday’s vote, Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats called Haspel a ‘‘trailblazer,’’ praising the mix of ‘‘frontline and executive experience’’ she has accumulated over a long career at the agency.
‘‘Her confirmation represents the best we have to offer as a country,’’ he said.
But it is the dark chapters of Haspel’s past — and that of the CIA — that imperiled her nomination from the start and will not be closed as she takes over at the agency’s headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
Throughout her nomination, Haspel and her supporters struggled to reconcile her portrayal as a capable, forceful leader, but one who lacked the authority to stop the interrogation program or overrule her boss’s decisions to order harsh interrogations and then destroy videotaped evidence.
Critics said she lacked the will to do so, and were unconvinced that she had learned a moral lesson from the agency’s torture of terrorist suspects — a program that was disbanded but that Trump has said should be restarted.
In late 2002, Haspel, then a senior leader in the Counterterrorism Center, managed a secret detention facility in Thailand where two Al Qaeda suspects were waterboarded, one of them before Haspel’s arrival.
Laura Pitter, a national security counsel at Human Rights Watch, called Haspel’s confirmation ‘‘the predictable and perverse byproduct’’ of the United States’ failure to reconcile with past abuses.
During her confirmation hearing, Haspel insisted that she would never allow torture at the CIA again, and she said she’d be guided in the future by her own ‘‘moral compass.’’ But she resolutely avoided saying whether, at the time, she thought the detention and interrogation of suspected terrorists was moral.
