Print      
Big banks make a pitch for hearts and minds
Harlem EatUp cofounder and celebrity chef Marcus Samuelsson, Food Business Pathways graduate Jaynine Taylor, Bravo host Bevy Smith, and Citi’s head of global public affairs, Ed Skyler, attended a Citi “breakfast party’’ in East Harlem, N.Y., in May. (Getty Images for Citi)
By Michael Corkery
New York Times

NEW YORK — At both the Democratic and Republican conventions, the nation’s biggest banks were again cast as the bad guys, criticized as being too big and too risky.

This week, as the Olympic Games begin in Brazil, one of the big banks, Citigroup, is offering a rebuttal with a series of prime-time television and digital ads featuring images of sweaty athletes, the space shuttle, and an early ATM.

“Our business is helping Americans make progress,’’ the ad’s narrator says, as a runner with a prosthetic leg sprints down a track.

Since the 2008 financial crisis, US banks have spent millions of dollars on advertising, consultants, and social media initiatives, seeking to portray themselves as something other than greedy risk-takers. And yet, eight years later, anger and resentment persist.

So the banks are ramping up their efforts — and trying new ways — to convince the public that they are not as bad as politicians make them out to be.

Citigroup, which was rescued by taxpayers after nearly collapsing during the financial crisis, is using its role as the sole banking sponsor of the Summer Olympics and Paralympics to make the case for the virtues of being a big global bank.

JPMorgan Chase’s chief executive, Jamie Dimon, recently wrote an op-ed article in The New York Times to announce how the nation’s largest bank was raising the wages of thousands of its lowest-paid workers.

And Bank of America has hired Bob Dylan’s son Jesse to produce a series of videos explaining to bank employees that their primary purpose is not to reap quick profits, but to help expand the economy.

“We can’t advertise our way into people’s hearts,’’ said Ed Skyler, Citigroup’s executive vice president for public affairs, who is overseeing the bank’s advertising. “But we have to keep talking about the value we bring to society.’’

The bank’s two-week advertising campaign will include an ad that ties together Citigroup’s sponsorship of the American athletes to the bank’s role in fueling the global economy.

Citigroup also plans to run an ad highlighting the bank’s role in rebuilding Europe after World War II through the Marshall Plan and in the construction of the Panama Canal.

That ad, which was first produced for Citigroup’s 200th anniversary in 2012, depicts a young woman riding a bike and an image of Theodore Roosevelt, a president who was not exactly Wall Street’s biggest fan. The ads are expected to start running during the opening ceremony Friday, though they are already available online.

Even as regulators today declare that banks are safer and more secure than they have been in decades, the animus in some quarters seems to be intensifying.

The Democratic Party’s platform includes a plank that calls for breaking up big banks if they are deemed too risky. And Hillary Clinton said in her convention speech that she would push to make sure Wall Street and the superrich paid their “fair share of taxes.’’

Both party platforms call for reinstating the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act, which mandated the separation of plain-vanilla deposit-taking from rocky road investment banking.

Investors are also questioning whether big banks can ever again increase returns in such a heavily regulated industry, driving down some of their share prices while most of the stock market rallies.

“I don’t think there is any one magical thing they can do to improve their image,’’ said Donald Kohn, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. “That’s going to take time. People are going to have to see that the banks are safer, that they are not enjoying any implicit public subsidies.’’

Some bank executives acknowledge that they have failed to adequately convey to the public the benefits of a large modern bank.

When Dimon was asked in February how he would explain to an analyst’s mother-in-law the benefit of being a large bank, he conceded, “We have a hard time explaining those things to the public.’’

Bank of America is trying something even more basic. Rather than make the case to the public, the bank is reminding its employees — through a series of videos — of what a bank actually does.

One of the videos, which is being shown to tellers, call center workers and even regulators, is titled the “Role of a Bank’’ and features a montage of images of small-town life: firefighters, farmers, factory workers, and lots of children.

It was created by Jesse Dylan’s film production company, Wondros, which also produced a music video inspired by Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign mantra “Yes We Can.’’

It might seem curious that the nation’s third-largest bank by assets feels the need to explain to its employees something as basic as how a bank takes deposits and lends them out in the community.

But bank executives say the videos are part of the strategy of its chief executive, Brian Moynihan, to focus employees’ attention on the bank’s supporting role in the economy, and not on a quest for the kinds of profits that were gained and then lost in the lead-up to the financial crisis.

The hope, the executives say, is that if employees believe that they have a higher purpose, it will rub off on the bank’s public image.

“It is a long road back for the banks,’’ Dylan said. “They have to earn that trust.’’